It has been few decades since those days when western women convincingly voiced their claim: "Men and Women are Equal".
* The word "Women" involves more than three billion humans today alive on planet Earth a majority of whom do not claim equality.
* The claim remains verbal since its early days. Nobody found a shred of evidence demonstrating that nature intended equality.
* Men's deeply embedded instincts on how nature wants them to conceive the human female are not considered. Men's instincts are ignored.
"Men and Women are Equal" is presented to logical minded men as a wish rather than a verifiable fact of life that nature itself wanted since the days humans lived in caves. The claim allows to see western women wanting men to believe in and to accept a claim just because women want them to. It is women's imposition on men as nature purposely remains marginalized.
Observing how women replicate and mimic what men do permits to see women with observable desperation ~or at least solid need~ to be equal to someone. In that process, women appear to not acknowledge that nature designed for them an identity, and roles to play in life.
* It is highly unlikely that nature ~since the early manhood years~ failed at providing men with instincts that make them see equality in their companions in life.
* It is highly unlikely that nature created two beings with sex as the only difference, but otherwise equal to each other who must play the same roles, compete against each other for survival, and compromise their relationship abandoning their kids as both perform the same roles.
* It is highly unlikely that nature made a mistake not considering equality.
* It is highly unlikely that nature gave women a job: to correct nature's mistakes.
Should Sociologists studying women be close at deciphering what nature wanted, it is reasonable to deduce that what nature wanted was to create two beings with opposing sexes and for each to perform their own roles. Once those roles are combined in the human couple, survival itself and developing a family would both grow healthfully.
Would it be safe to construe that marginalizing and ignoring nature's wisdom and rules by arbitrarily shuffling roles that women prefer to play in life likely create consequences with a price tag attached to it ?
Should "Men and Women are Equal" be not more than desperation or need surfacing in the form of replicating and mimicking men out of not being happy with nature's decisions, then, women are forced into an inescapable position, and that is to comprehend that nature is not negotiable and that it commands the last word.
Should evidences not be found in nature manifesting that equality was intended by nature, it is then up to western women to demonstrate how trustworthy, responsible, and reliable they are by accepting nature-given roles to play in life with no attempts to modify nature; and to show the human obligation to be considerate to others by not forcing men and children ~not claiming anything to pay a price.
1. Eat a bowl of raspberries. 
